Defence & security CRX-WP-0142 v1 · current

Requirements, Not Radars: What Counter-UAS Acquisition Actually Buys

A median of 26 months separates threat characterisation from first delivery across the six programmes reviewed.

editorial image — abstract / cartographic
art-directed per lead

Latest research

All research →

17%

of sampled programmes re-baselined a requirement after a threat update

Programme documentation review, n=6 programmes · specimen

71%

of expeditionary print cells lost lot traceability after a field decant

Site observation, expeditionary print cells, n=7 sites · specimen

0%

of verification vendors agreed on a single impression definition

Vendor specification comparison, 3 vendors · specimen

83%

of reviewed requirement documents cited threat characterisation more than 24 months old

Programme documentation review, n=6 programmes · specimen

Every finding, traceable to the thing that produced it.

Published versions are immutable, corrections are visible, and a citation resolves to the exact version you read. We publish for people who have to act on it — acquisition officials, commanders and staff, regulators, and the analysts who brief them.

↑↓ to move ⏎ to open esc to close Type an identifier to jump straight to it